orgtheory.net

how to teach social theory and rock

with 10 comments

Every prof has a course that they’ve got down solid. Mine is undergraduate social theory. Students really, really like this course. Since social theory is often seen as a thorny course to teach, I’ll share my experiences and teaching strategy. Let’s start with my assumptions:

  • Most undergrad theory students will not go to graduate school.  Don’t teach them as if reading Weber foot notes will consume the rest of their lives.
  • The social theory course is intimidating. We expose students to thinkers who write in a difficult style and work with huge ideas.
  • Students know the material is supposed to be hard, but they chose the major. They are willing to give it a shot.
  • Nearly every piece of writing can be broken down into a few ideas and transmitted to an educated person.
  • The great social thinkers are part of our heritage. They are worth teaching so students will have an exposure to the achievements of our intellectual culture.

Here’s my strategy:

  • The readings: Make them read the originals! No textbooks – they become crutches. Make them grapple with great ideas. That’s what college is for!
  • The topics: Greatest hits. Unless you’re getting a PhD in the subject, most people will not have the patience for reading all 1,000 pages of Economy and Society. So Weber and other core figures get one or two lectures. I use the Lemert reader – lots of short, but dense, readings.
  • The topics II: I teach a core module on classical theory (inc. Simmel & soc psych), a module on race, gender and sexuality and a model on assorted modern topics.
  • Classroom: At first, I give a few lectures, then I move into a free form discussion led by me. Since most students seem paralyzed by reading original work (because they’ve done watered down texts for four years), lecturing usually makes it worse. I need to soften them up with neat stories, humor, and a relaxed atmosphere. Dorm room chat is a better model than master scholar transmitting brilliant ideas.
  • Discussion style: I have a few strategies. I will make students read a passage and then we will puzzle over it: “alienated labor? Wonder what that means?” Another tactic is to focus on the key concepts for the day and work through popular culture. Youtube clips help a lot here. I also throw in the occasional personal anecdote, just to get them mellowed out from a weekend of reading Mead. However, the goal is to allow the students to extract the core idea from the readings. Short handouts with a selected quote or key words helps.
  • Constant work: Social theory is not a topic you can really master by “dropping in” when exam time comes around. You need a sustained effort to really get a grip. Thus, I concoct an assignment for nearly every class meeting – a short summary, a quiz, whatever. I also use the daily summaries to motivate class discussion – “I’m glad you mentioned double consciousness – what does that mean?”
  • Relaxed days: Since there is an incredible amount of work, I have “safety valves.” There are some days where nothing is due. You can also drop the two lowest marks for daily summaries (essentially allowing a skip or two during the semester).
  • Essays: There’s a lot of writing. I avoid the generic “summarize X and critique it.” Instead, my assignments usually start by asking students about a topic. Later assignments require the students to use various ideas in social theory to analyze that topic. It’s very hard because they have to really master the idea before they can even start writing. And they can’t crimp off the Internet or wikipedia because they chose the topic and the theory (“How am I going to write a feminist analysis of Halo?”)
  • The mellow Fabio: Given the huge amount of work and the fact that people may not do well at the start, I’m pretty lenient when people are late with assignments. I also provide multiple opportunities to pull up your grade.

In other words: My social theory class raises the bar for most sociology undergrads and I demand commitment and I create assignments that encourage commitment. At the same time, I try to pace the work and provide a relaxed environment. I also try to make social theory describe the world people live in. Add your own social theory tips in the comments.

Written by fabiorojas

September 14, 2009 at 12:49 am

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Question: how many students are typically in your class? (trying to get a mental image of your Classroom and Discussion Style bullet points)

    Natalie

    September 14, 2009 at 2:19 am

  2. What course level does your theory course fall in? Assuming you’ve taught this course at more than one institution, did the level (sophomore level, senior level) make you modify the types of readings and approach you took to the class?

    Hillbilly

    September 14, 2009 at 2:22 am

  3. I’m not surprised this is one of your best courses. Questions: do you contrast social theory with say a Paul Lazarsfeld empiricism, or a Popperian-Hempelian methodological individualism? do you go into political agenda or careerist questions (the homo academicus angle) with respect to Weber especially, but many of them really? do you discuss whether a theory should be encompassing, or a cool prop for a “cookie” in John Meyer’s sense?

    My guess is, questions like these get left to grad school, but should they I wonder sometimes.

    Tony

    September 14, 2009 at 2:58 am

  4. I agree with all of your points, and use most of them. Do you have a syllabus posted somewhere? I have some nitty-gritty questions, but need to see exactly what you do before I can frame them properly.

    Gruntled

    September 14, 2009 at 3:03 am

  5. Natalie: My class has 25 students each semester. It’s required and it fills nearly every time.

    Hill: Junior level, but it’s mostly seniors who take it. They postpone till the last minute. Also, I’d adopt the same approach and readings at most institutions, though in schools with very strong core curricula, I’d be a bit more abstract in my approach.

    Tony: Those sorts of questions are routine in my graduate courses, but in the undergrad, I try to stick just getting people to absorb the theory.

    Gruntled: I’ll post the syllabus tomorrow.

    fabiorojas

    September 14, 2009 at 4:12 am

  6. I thought Jenn Lena was the expert on how to teach Social Theory and Rock.

    Kieran

    September 14, 2009 at 12:33 pm

  7. Kieran: agreed! I guess I shred.

    fabio

    September 14, 2009 at 3:02 pm

  8. I thought Jenn Lena was the expert on how to teach Social Theory and Rock.

    wow.

    Peter

    September 14, 2009 at 7:51 pm

  9. Nice post Fabio. I’m currently teaching undergrad social theory, and also feel it to be my bread-and-butter at this point. I agree whole-heartedly with most of your pedagogical principles. I would add:

    Biography: I find that my students actually like hearing about the lives of the theorists. To know that Marx was an aspirant poet or that Weber had terrible insomnia. That Adam Smith was once kidnapped by gypsies or that Durkheim intensely mourned the death of his son Andre in WWI.

    jsallaz

    September 15, 2009 at 6:58 am

  10. Great post. I will take it to heart when I do undergrad org theory in the Spring.

    I have found that a student blog is a great way to “make theory come to life.”

    Bloginization, a student blog

    Jordi

    September 18, 2009 at 3:09 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 337 other followers