orgtheory.net

election through network

One of the most interesting things about electoral politics is that you don’t need to be particularly charismatic or knowledgeable if you have the right networks. Especially in smaller elections, where having a few key connections can mobilize the voters who make the difference. Consider the following quote from Martha Coakley, the Mass. democrat who is running for Ted Kennedy’s seat. A reporter asked if it was wise to rely on party insiders and unions:

“As opposed to standing outside Fenway Park? In the cold? Shaking hands? This is a special election. And I know that I have the support of Kim Driscoll. And I now know the members of the [Salem] School Committee, who know far more people than I could ever meet.’

Of course, she can still lose. A string of nasty comments probably means that she will. Still, if Coakley merely did the minimal PR and said nice things, she could probably win this contest. There are many politicians (Bush II, Daley, Jr.) who got to where they were merely by not saying offensive things in public and relying on pre-existing networks.

Written by fabiorojas

January 15, 2010 at 4:21 pm

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. In Massachusetts, it’s all about political networks. When my state representative was rumored to step down and take another job, I worked on the proto-campaign of one of the wannabe replacements (Democrat of course). 90% of the work I did was tapping into those networks and making sure we had support lined up before the current state rep made the official announcement that he was stepping down. We never really talked about the issues. Due to unforeseen political circumstances, the current rep didn’t end up stepping down, but had he done so the campaign would have been close to over and winner picked as soon as he announced.

    Like

    joshmccabe

    January 15, 2010 at 7:37 pm

  2. Special elections have unpredictable turnout. I’m very curious to see who shows up to vote on Tuesday (I’m a MA voter). Especially if turnout is mostly restricted to knowledgeable and partisan voters, Coakley seems to have the right idea about skipping Fenway handshakes. But I wonder what the role of TV ads are for special elections. At least on the first round of ads, Scott Brown’s seemed much better. And he didn’t spell Massachusetts wrong!

    Like

    perchesk

    January 16, 2010 at 6:25 am


Comments are closed.