is there an atlantic divide in organizational research?
The received wisdom is that there is an “Atlantic divide” between Europe and North America vis-a-vis organizational research. Joel Baum, using citation data from three compendia, finds that the “Atlantic divide” is essentially a myth.
Here’s the abstract:
It is customary among contemporary organization theorists to equate North American and European scholarship with objectivist and subjectivist metatheoretical positions (respectively), treat these positions as mutually exclusive alternatives, and debate which is best suited to understanding organizational phenomena. Fueled by this dispute, questions of bias and fears of colonization are readily apparent in academic reviews of three recent “handbooks” of organizations. Caught in the current of these tensions, I was prompted to assess the status of this “Atlantic divide.” To do so, I examined the three recent compendia in terms of the rhetoric academic reviewers employed to characterize them and the geographic locations, preferred journals, and university affiliations of scholars who refer to them. The results are striking. Despite the unanimous typecasting of the volumes as epitomizing either objectivist North American or subjectivist European traditions, the geographic distributions of researchers citing them are indistinguishable. Citations to each compendium are, however, clustered within particular journals and among authors with particular university affiliations—but neither the journals nor universities are neatly North American or European. Current associations of these traditions with North American and European scholarship thus seem driven more by academic rhetoric than authentic continental distinctions. I examine the roots of this rhetorical mapping and explore its implications for the field. I advocate abandonment of the myth of the Atlantic divide and exploitation of perspectives that do not privilege the subjectivist–objectivist dichotomy.
Key Words: organization and management theory; subjectivst versus objectivist perspectives
And paper, forthcoming in Organization Science.
Here’s a previous post highlighting Joel’s work on journal versus article-effects.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jason Jensen, ah0y. ah0y said: There’s a received wisdom of an “Atlantic divide” between Europe and North America vis-a-vis organizational rese… http://bit.ly/hnD1sL [...]
Tweets that mention is there an atlantic divide in organizational research? « orgtheory.net -- Topsy.com
February 15, 2011 at 1:00 am
If there is not Atlantic divide, what about the divide or Westernization appeared Asia organizational research?
Whether organization research in Asia mainly adopted those Western thoughts first, then developed those context-specific ideas in Asia afterward?
Der Chao Chen
February 15, 2011 at 2:05 am
[...] is there an atlantic divide in organizational research? [...]
Daily Links for February 14th through February 15th | Akkam's Razor
February 15, 2011 at 6:02 pm