orgtheory.net

More on the Tepid Tea (Party)

with 3 comments

Every time I log on to the world, there’s more evidence that the Tea Party movement’s moment is passing.

We see the strength of American social movements in their organizations, their ideas, and their activities.  (We’ve covered much of this over the past few months, here, here, here, and here–and elsewhere.)

On this last point, the signs of decline are hard to ignore–and opponents are quick to point them out.

At ThinkProgress, Alex Seitz-Wall posts a list of Tea Party demonstrations, this year and last, noting much smaller turnouts and even fewer rallies.   Are we getting to the bottom of the tea pot?

(There’s a similar story, with numbers and sources, at there’s a similar story, with numbers and sources, at the anarchist site, Infoshopnews.)  And here’s a table Moveon posted:

Demonstrations and rallies are only part of a social movement’s repertoire, but for a movement, the  numbers game is unavoidable–and unwinnable over even the medium haul.

The frequent, and sometimes relatively large, demonstrations Tea Partiers staged over the 2010 set a baseline of comparison that activists will be hard-pressed to surpass.  Organizing large demonstrations takes a lot of time and money, and getting people to turn out requires a sense of urgency and efficacy.  It’s not always the appropriate priority for a social movement.

Republicans, expressing more and less credible fealty to Tea Party ideals (not always well-defined), made huge electoral gains in 2010, and now are trying to find ways to deliver on their promises.  Much of the politics has moved indoors.

Meantime, the Tea Party’s rather ill-defined agenda has allowed elected officials to run with it off in different directions.  Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget, which included the end of Medicare as an entitlement, is one direction that hasn’t commanded enthusiasm at the grassroots. Senator Rand Paul voted against it.  And Senator Paul, who claims, with some credibility to have been a Tea Partier even before the Party started, has been working against the renewal of the Patriot Act and funding America’s current wars–not positions that have generated much enthusiasm from his Republican colleagues in Congress.

When you have an institutional ally, taking to the streets seems less urgent, particularly when there are alternative ways to pursue politics, like lobbying and campaigning.  Right now, the most important alternative for Tea Partiers seems to be the unfolding campaigns for the Republican Party’s presidential nomination.  Most of the hopefuls are trying to find ways to demonstrate their commitments to Tea Party voters within the Republican Party primaries, without hampering their ability to tack to the center during a general election campaign.  It’s not pretty.

Most people try to find the most direct and least disruptive way to get what they want from politics.  For most of those who supported the Tea Party last year, it’s no longer through large rallies.  Organizers know this–or should–and try to find ways to take advantage of what their supporters do want to do.  Sometimes, it’s local politics; sometimes it’s national campaigns; sometimes it’s just giving money.  We’ll watch to see how much of any of these alternatives is actually happening.

When the turnout at the grassroots diminishes, the Tea evaporating, what’s left will be more intense, even bitter.

Advertisement

Written by David S. Meyer

May 29, 2011 at 5:11 pm

Posted in uncategorized

Tagged with , ,

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. It seems that so much of the featured commentary on this website are defunct of a theoretical perspective. This article about the waining of the Tea Party movement is a good example. Where is the theoretical organizational perspective? What is a social movement? How does the Tea Party match up to a definition of a socia/political movement?

    Do they actually constitute an “organization”? What elementary organizational units/concepts are or are not in play in sociologically demonstrating this decline? How is the “Tea Party” fit into a perspective that includes organization and social movement theory.

    In other words, where is the sociological perspective?

    Patrick Carney

    May 30, 2011 at 9:44 pm

  2. Dear Prof. Meyer, I look upon the decline of the Tea Party with some delight, but I wonder if you can provide some commentary comparing the decline of the Tea Party with the decline of the Antiwar movement?

    Best,
    Andrew

    Andrew

    May 31, 2011 at 3:50 pm

  3. @Andrew: Perhaps you’ll be more disappointed that the same dynamics are at work in the peace movement. I’ve written about this [http://politicsoutdoors.com/2011/04/26/wheres-the-peace-movement-protest-is-a-blunt-instrument/] (as have Fabio and Michael Heaney):

    “Protest is a blunt instrument; an action pushes a direction or suggests a veto. The grammar of a demonstration doesn’t accommodate complicated policy alternatives. When the direction seems more promising, the urgency or possibility needed to engage falters for some people. Others may feel they can talk directly to policymakers, rather than shouting at them from the lawn. The demonstrations got smaller and those who did attend had a somewhat different set of concerns than the larger movement.

    Movements are coalitions, not unified beasts. And people and groups in those coalitions respond to the world around them, figuring out their best shot to move the world in the direction they want and recalculating constantly.”

    David S. Meyer

    May 31, 2011 at 4:04 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 272 other followers