orgtheory.net

anonymous survey: do you google the papers you review?

OK, I don’t think we’ve used the handy survey feature here at orgtheory before, so here goes.  So, with reference to the previous post — here’s an unscientific and anonymous poll (don’t worry: it’s anonymous, only the numbers/percentages are reported):

Advertisement

Written by teppo

July 14, 2009 at 9:28 pm

Posted in uncategorized

11 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Do you view the results of polls before you vote in them?

    Like

    Jesse

    July 14, 2009 at 11:31 pm

  2. As I said, the poll is not scientific.

    Like

    tf

    July 15, 2009 at 4:38 am

  3. It’s a pity the results don’t show the number of responses..

    Like

    Rense

    July 15, 2009 at 7:35 am

  4. Rense: I’m new to using the polling feature — I’ll see if I can tweak it so that the #s also show up (though hopefully the poll then does not “re-set” itself).

    Like

    tf

    July 15, 2009 at 5:44 pm

  5. OK, the actual numbers should now be visible. (And, yes — the poll only allows one vote per person, based on computer/ip address.)

    So far we have the following results (in case I am the only one seeing these…).

    Question: Do you google the papers that you review?

    Yes, almost every time. 39% (37 votes)

    Yes, but only after I have reviewed the piece. 18% (17 votes)

    Yes, I have done that once. 15% (14 votes)

    No, I have never done that. 28% (26 votes)

    Interesting.

    Like

    tf

    July 15, 2009 at 9:30 pm

  6. Interesting results. Given these results, what strategic responses should one make when submitting a paper? Should an author with little professional success (so far), a graduate student, or someone at a less distinguished university not host working papers online?

    Like

    Gordo

    July 16, 2009 at 11:24 am

  7. I will now.

    Like

    Seth

    July 16, 2009 at 6:54 pm

  8. Gordo: I know many journals request that one removes any online versions off-line during the review process. Though, obviously one often can’t control the ‘cached version’ issue. Changing titles of course might be another strategy (since paper titles are listed on conference programs). And, ideally reviewers resist the temptation to google and truly keep things blind to guard against any potential bias.

    Like

    tf

    July 16, 2009 at 7:31 pm

  9. […] a comment » I thought the results of our previous, unscientific survey were very interesting: almost 60% of people googled paper titles either before or after reviewing them for a journal.  […]

    Like

  10. […] The illusion of blind peer review. […]

    Like

  11. […] and internet search engines.  This question came up at Orgtheory a while back, with the definitive follow-up poll suggesting that most people do look up the authors of papers they are reviewing, either before or […]

    Like


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: