is there a CSI effect in criminal law?
Here are some proposed effects.
Here’s the paper (pdf): Cole, S.A. & Dioso-Villa, R. 2009. Investigating the CSI effect: Media and litigation crisis in criminal law. Stanford Law Review.
Here are some proposed effects.
Here’s the paper (pdf): Cole, S.A. & Dioso-Villa, R. 2009. Investigating the CSI effect: Media and litigation crisis in criminal law. Stanford Law Review.
Written by teppo
July 7, 2011 at 2:30 am
Posted in law and society
Subscribe to comments with RSS.
Comments are closed.
“In addition, we found that media discussions of the CSI effect gave voice to
remarkably little skepticism about the claims that the CSI effect is actually
occurring (Table 8). For example, of 197 documents mentioning the strong
prosecutor’s effect, only 34 gave voice to skepticism about the effect actually
occurring. This is particularly striking, given that most legal scholars have
expressed doubt that CSI actually has changed jury behavior. Indeed, several of
the 34 articles voicing doubt are profiles of academics, like Donald Shelton or
Kimberlianne Podlas, who have done empirical research that casts doubt on the
claims advanced on behalf of the strong prosecutor’s effect.”
Not all “academic” studies are created equal. Kimberlianne Podlas surveyed 306 college students in a mock trial. Judge Donald Shelton and his colleagues sampled over 1000 actual jurors. Still, it seems clear that the “CSI Effect” lives a healthy life in articles about it, rather than in the actual courtroom environment.
One of the results published by Shelton, Kim, and Barack is that jurors with less education expected more physical evidence. The irony, of course, is that they are less capable of evaluating such scientific forensics.
LikeLike
Michael E. Marotta
July 7, 2011 at 1:45 pm
[…] Here are some proposed effects. Here's the paper (pdf): Cole, S.A. & Dioso-Villa, R. 2009. Investigating the CSI effect: Media and litigation crisis in criminal law. Stanford Law Review. … Read More […]
LikeLike
is there a CSI effect in criminal law? (via orgtheory.net) Or are Jurors Confused on Difference Between A Reasonable Doubt or Any Doubt? UPDATE | Taking On A Cause by Patsy McCaw-Yager,Englewood, Fl.
July 7, 2011 at 3:55 pm
Some time ago I blogged here about my experiences as a juror on a murder trial (https://orgtheory.wordpress.com/author/russcoff/). There I saw the CSI effect first hand. In jury selection, they asked us explicitly if we watched CSI or other similar crime shows. When the jury was seated, they then made a point of saying that evidence in the real world is rarely as clean as is presented on the show. They were very concerned that a jury would not convict if they held prosecutors to the fictional standards.
LikeLike
RussCoff
July 11, 2011 at 11:12 pm
Russ: that’s right! Thanks for the reminder —- yes, clearly criminal courts are aware of the effect (probably to varying levels, and defenses play on the effect to get people off – well benefits may also accrue to prosecutors if played right).
LikeLike
teppo
July 11, 2011 at 11:18 pm