orgtheory.net

origins of language: ding-dong and other theories

Theorizing the origins of language has been a popular endeavor.  The different theories of origins were given pet names: the ding-dong theory focused on origins of language based on what things sounded like, pooh-pooh theory focused on spontaneous interjectional sounds, and the bow-wow theory focused on imitation.  These theoretical categories were originally discussed by Max Müller, see his (free Google ebook) 1861 Lectures on the Science of Language.

And a few related links:

Advertisements

Written by teppo

June 6, 2012 at 10:52 pm

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. All of the above. Evolutionary linguistics has no commanding paradigm. Rather, it is “the blind men and the elephant.” Clearly, each of these perceives a set of data that it seeks to explain. Those offered paradigms fail to explain enough other facts that none can command the field. Ding-dong and bow-wow are both onomotopoeia. Freud suggested from his studies of dreams that we think (and therefore speak) in opposites: hyper-hypo; super-supra; sup-sub; cellar-celestial. In Hungarian fekete (black) and feher (white) with k-h shift.

    From that, we differentiate shades of meaning. In Indo-European, BL denotes (or connotes) a swelling: bell, blue, ball, blade…

    As humanoids could make more sounds and remember them, they did. Considering what crows can do, it is not so peculiar as to be a problem.

    The only problem is awarding First Place to the most popular professors, since their theories seem equivalently incomplete… (snake, wall, rope, sword, tree)

    Like

    Michael Marotta

    June 7, 2012 at 2:50 am


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: