research outside the academy part II: some background and reflections on institutional logics.

Since defending my dissertation (in 2003), I’ve worked in both academia and for the DMV.  Prior to moving back to California, I was an assistant professor in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Texas Christian University (TCU).  I’ve continued to teach as an adjunct in the Department of Sociology at CSU-Sacramento while working full-time for DMV. 

There are a number of differences between the two types of organization.  Some of these differences are obvious, some not.  Some of these differences tend to be in favor of the academy, and others tend to be in favor of state service.  First, and most obviously, there is the matter of pay and benefits.  The salary range of our research program specialist series (the main job titles that are associated with research work in California state service) are roughly equivalent to the salary range of tenure-track faculty in the CSU system.  In addition, we have a defined-benefit pension in retirement.  On the other hand – and this point will surely hit home for this audience – working for state government involves a non-trivial step down in occupational prestige.  Not a season goes by but what I have to answer some version of the question “you have a PhD and you work where?!?”  Usually these questions come from persons outside the academy, and probably reflect some inherent sense of the disjuncture between having a high-status degree and working for one of the most “common” government departments (as opposed to a more “rarified” shop like the Demographic Research Unit at the state’s Department of Finance – an outfit which, I should note, does truly outstanding work).  Academics may be puzzled by my position, but they are often quickly curious as to the kinds of data we have access to, the kinds of methodologies we use, the publication possibilities, etc.  Those working in government are, if anything, impressed by the fact that California DMV has an R&D unit (most states don’t); they are also respectful of the fact that our agency (and the legislature) takes empirical research into account when setting policy. 

In a less tangible manner, working for a government agency is stressful in different ways than teaching.  While students expect professors to be available 24/7, this is not true of state service.  Once the work day is done, I can go home and not worry about checking my e-mail until the next day.  That said, the implications of a mistake are very different.  In teaching, if we say something that isn’t quite right in lecture we can usually address it in a subsequent class session.  If we make an error in a publication, we can issue an erratum.  It’s embarrassing, but usually not grossly consequential.  In state service, on the other hand, a mistaken statement – or worse, a faulty set of analyses and recommendations – can have real, dramatic, and long-lasting effects on policy and revenues, and ultimately on people’s lives.  For that reason (among others), we have multiple layers of review for our studies and publications. 

Finally, I would note that when considering a career in government service, it is useful to think about the implications of the grand logics of different types of organizations (cf. Weber 1922; Dobbin 1994; Meyer and Rowan 1977; Meyer and Scott 1983; DiMaggio and Powell 1991).  We all know, for instance, that those working in for-profit businesses generally judge a given person’s performance through monetary means.  It is only more rarely that we reflect on the fact that those working in government agencies tend to judge personal performance through metrics of power.  In my experience, it is rarer yet that we admit the truth about academic institutions: that people are judged almost entirely in terms of reputation (and not just one’s own, but more broadly that of one’s advisor as well as one’s institutions, both past and present – see Etzkowitz, Kemelgor and Uzzi 2000).  Switching from one field to another usually necessitates that one be prepared to operate under a different set of institutional rules and expectations.  In the case of moving from the academy to the state, this means (among other things) caring much less about what people think about one’s work, and caring much more about making things happen.


Written by A garrett renter on Welbeck St.

December 2, 2013 at 1:26 am

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Thanks for sharing your experiences, Bayliss. What was the reason you left academia for a govt job?



    December 2, 2013 at 3:49 pm

  2. Just realized the question is too personal. Sorry about that. To rephrase it: what do you see as the benefits of a research career in govt versus academia? Thanks.



    December 2, 2013 at 4:57 pm

  3. I really liked your paper titled “mobilizing the base”. I do hope you keep publishing studies on the tactics and outcomes of LGBT rights movements.



    December 3, 2013 at 1:40 pm

  4. @Valerio: it is a personal question, but I don’t mind answering it. I left academia for two inter-related reasons. First, my spouse and I decided that we didn’t want to live in Texas anymore.* Second, after three years on the academic job market, I had had only one interview (which didn’t result in an offer). Put those two together, and we just decided to get up and leave. In doing so, my spouse found a position within three days, and I found one within three months. I didn’t even have to skip a paycheck or run out my COBRA. Quite apart from all the ancillary goodies associated with living in California, we each got a substantial raise with our new jobs (in excess of 25% in both cases).

    As for the benefits of a research career in government, I’ll try to expound a little more on that theme in my next post.

    @Eric. Thank you for the kudos.

    *For the record, I have a deep and abiding respect for TCU as an institution, and for my colleagues in my old department there. Our reasons for leaving Texas were in fact personal and political, rather than job-related.



    December 4, 2013 at 6:13 am

  5. Thanks, Bayliss – and my apologies once again. I very much look forward to your next post.



    December 5, 2013 at 1:02 am

  6. […] on the differences between academic and governmental work […]


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: