orgtheory.net

Between Francis and Trump, the religious right is going to keep losing

 

Neither (President?!) Trump nor Pope Francis is a liberal, despite what they or anyone else might say. Trump might have a quasi-liberal past, but he’s mostly a bigot misogynist racist with all sorts of pasts at this point, of which some, I assume, are good people. Francis is also no liberal, at least not on the social (read: sexual) issues that have generally mattered in the U.S. culture wars.

Yet what’s striking about both Francis and Trump is how they’ve shifted attention away from the social issues that have traditionally been a key element of conservative politics. That move has been happening for a while, especially for the cultural right. Well before the Supreme Court supported the right to gay marriage, an increasing amount of theologically conservative Christians distinguished themselves from the preceding generations’ politics.  These are folks of various religions who like Francis not because he’s a cultural liberal (he’s not!) but because he emphasizes economic and environmental justice rather than the sexual issues that have animated the American religious right. The change in focus makes Francis attractive to both religious and non-religious who think poverty and climate change are also “moral issues.”

It’s harder to explain Trump’s attraction. Cruz didn’t do great, but he did a lot better than people thought he would: clearly the culture wars aren’t over. There’s also pretty clear evidence that the more you go to church the less you like Trump, so those conservative Christians who support him tend to be “Christian-ish,” with their religion functioning as a badge of ethnic and cultural identity rather than as a marker of religious devotion. It’s an interesting connection to early modern Europeans’ separation of themselves from other races by their being “Christian,” and yet another indication that Trump’s win is a lot about the deep-seated racism still very much at play in American cultural life. There’s sexism there too, and all sorts of other forms of resentment motivating the kind of welfare hoarding Trump is pitching to disaffected whites. It’s noteworthy these folks are voting out of economic and racial resentment rather than the traditional concerns of social conservatism. (It’s of course the case that social conservatism, like everything else in United States politics, is racialized, though it’s striking how unsubtle, and even unnecessary, that link is for Trump.)

Both Francis and Trump ostensibly agree with social conservatives, but they’ve compelled many of them to change their emphases to issues that have nothing to do with their typical concerns. Of course, Francis fans are probably not the same people as Trump fans, and in some ways that’s the point: the culture wars just keep getting cut in different ways. Some warriors, like Rod Dreher, have suggested just giving up, retreating into like-minded communities until the Dark Ages are done. Others remain in for the long haul, but Trump’s win is even worse news for them than Obergefell. This isn’t a defeat at the hands of a too-powerful, out-of-touch bunch of judges. This is the voters who once composed “the moral majority.”  After the shifts towards economic and environmental justice from Francis  and his ilk, alongside the moves towards unapologetic ethnic nationalism from Trumpites, there’s not even a moral plurality left.

The culture war is still going strong.  The religious right, however, is not.

Written by jeffguhin

May 4, 2016 at 9:37 pm

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. New Idea to stop trump: Run the Insane Clown Posse for both Pres and Veep. Culture war…over. We won.

    Liked by 1 person

    jlm

    May 5, 2016 at 4:20 pm

  2. I largely agree with your blog, Jeff. Cruz was the last social conservative left standings. I’m happy to see him go, but he did stand for something. Trump has a keen nose for the stink that a lot of voters want to wallow in, and an eagerness to inflame base passions, but he has no principles, let alone conservative ones. So at the national level, the right-wing side of the culture wars is pretty well washed up. (It’s entirely another matter at the level of legislative districts.)

    But I wish you would rethink the presumption that “social issues . . . have traditionally been a key element of conservative politics.” Maybe I’m just too old, but I remember when the Democratic party, being heavily, perhaps even “traditionally,” Catholic, was not the party of “choice” and when evangelicals didn’t care about abortion. There was a partisan re-alliance in the years after Roe v. Wade. How it was that the Republican party, which “traditionally” (at least since Coolidge) was the party of small government and big business, took up abortion is something to explain, not something to take for granted. The alliance between the religious and economic right wings has been unstable for years. It was bound to unravel.

    Liked by 1 person

    Steve Warner

    May 5, 2016 at 8:01 pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: