orgtheory.net

keith murnighan, rip

Keith Murnighan, a dear friend and colleague, passed away yesterday after a hard fought battle with cancer. It was a sad day for those of us who knew him. Keith was a vibrant member of the Northwestern community, but his influence extended well beyond Evanston, which is evident from the outpouring of support and sentiment I’ve witnessed over the last couple of days. People loved Keith, and his influence as a scholar was deep and broad.

Keith came into organizational behavior during its “golden era,” just as organizational sociologists and social psychologists began bringing their  perspectives into this interdisciplinary field. Keith got his PhD in social psychology in 1974 and then joined the organizational behavior department at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign at a time when the younger members of the department included Jeff Pfeffer, Jerry Salancik, Barry Staw, Dave Whetten, and Greg Oldham. Keith, along with this venerable cast of characters, would make Illinois one of the top organizations departments in the world and help bring social psychology into the mainstream of organizational behavior. Keith’s tastes and interests were diverse. Much of his early research infused experimental methods into game theory. At the time this type of experimental, psychology-inflected decision theory was a bit strange, but it has since become foundational to what we know as behavioral economics. One of Keith’s frequent coauthors during this time, Al Roth, went on to win a Nobel in economics. Al credited Keith for introducing him to experiments.

Keith’s influence on organizational behavior extends well beyond his forays into behavioral economics. OB scholars might know him most for his work on group behavior inside organizations or for his research on the psychological foundations of trust and cooperation.  One of his most highly cited pieces – and the paper of his that I first read – looks at the inherent paradoxes of cooperation in intense work groups and examines how groups deal with these paradoxes without ever completely resolving them. The empirical setting was British string quartets. The paper cleverly recognizes that conflict and tension between members of a work  group are actually productive and that the key to successful group interaction is to facilitate constructive conflict while avoiding disruptive conflict. I teach lessons from this paper in my classes all the time.

It was easy to see how influential Keith became by observing him at a conference, where he was always a rock star. In my first year at Northwestern, I saw Keith at an Academy of Management conference, and I started walking towards him to say hello. But I never got the chance because he was quickly surrounded by a crowd of people – friends, former students, admirers. Keith mentored many people and was a coauthor to many. Since joining Kellogg in 1996, Keith has served on the dissertation committees – either as a member or as the primary advisor – of dozens of PhD students. I imagine that most Kellogg PhD students who have passed through our department have taken at least one class from class Keith. The grad students at Kellogg loved Keith and many credited him for their success.  But Keith was always willing to mentor and help young people outside of Kellogg as well. He was a community builder, and he was generous in his time and energy in making young people feel included in that community. (Keith had breakfast with nearly every job candidate we’ve interviewed in the past decade or so. It was important to give candidates the best first impression possible). It’s also the case that Keith was passionate about his beliefs and ideas. If he disagreed with you, he let you know it. He cared greatly, which was evident in every meeting or chat I had with him. He was also extremely warm, and as one colleague commented to me yesterday, he was capable of leaving you feeling good after every conversation you had with him.

It was my pleasure to co-teach a class with Keith this year. It was a class that neither of us had taught before, but we were both eager to try it out and learn together. I was grateful for the chance to work closely with Keith and see how he organized his ideas and lectures. Keith was actually going through cancer treatment at the time, and I worried that he wouldn’t be able to finish the class. I asked him at one point if he wanted me to take over. Anyone who knows Keith will not be surprised by his reaction. There was no way he wasn’t going to finish that class. He loved every minute of it and he brought a passion and energy to the classroom that exceeded his actual physical strength. I was delighted when I learned that Keith won two teaching awards in the last year of his life. It meant so much to him. He loved being an educator as much as he enjoyed the intensity of research.

Keith was  a great person, a wonderful scholar, a deep thinker, and an enthusiastic colleague. I miss him already.

 

Written by brayden king

June 4, 2016 at 4:40 pm

Posted in uncategorized

11 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Very sad news. What a renaissance scholar – was just looking through the range of things he published: https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=oWCvw3AAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao

    Like

    teppo

    June 4, 2016 at 4:48 pm

  2. That’s a good way to describe him Teppo. He knew a lot about a lot of things.

    Like

    brayden king

    June 4, 2016 at 4:53 pm

  3. Big time! When I came through to give a talk there at Kellogg in 2009 or so, I had a long breakfast with him. We discussed an astounding range of topics (mostly him bringing up things that I needed to read) and he gave me feedback on an agent-based simulation. Incredible range. And nice, and so generous.

    Like

    teppo

    June 4, 2016 at 5:18 pm

  4. This is a fitting tribute to a really fine person. You do him the honor he deserved.

    Like

    Bruce Carruthers

    June 4, 2016 at 5:20 pm

  5. Keith was a prince. He taught me so many things, and was so funny. Some of my best memories are hanging out with him and Max when they were housemates one year at Stanford, they were both so giving — especially to students. Keith was also more fun to drink with than any other colleague. And of course his work was imaginative and varied. I always loved his string quartet paper (including the lesson that, when the best teams start fighting, they shut up and just start playing). And when I was associate editor at ASQ, I handled one of his papers, and the toughest reviewer (who Keith eventually got to come around) was Herb Simon. They connected after that, and Simon was gracious, but still gave Keith grief about parts of the paper. So sad

    Like

  6. Incredibly sad news. RIP, Keith.

    Like

    Patricia Ledesma

    June 4, 2016 at 8:07 pm

  7. Keith was a great person and an amazing mentor. Without question one of my favorite people on the planet. His vitality and generosity will truly be missed. Much love to Keith’s family…

    Like

    Jim Oakley

    June 4, 2016 at 9:00 pm

  8. Brayden, Beautiful words for a beautiful person, just as you say. Keith’s vitality, optimism, and good will coupled with genuine curiosity yielded so many inventive, insightful studies. And, a life of connecting. Agree on the British string quartet – as you say, these lessons show up in all my teaching! Thank you for putting these words together. Marc

    Liked by 1 person

    Marc Ventresca

    June 4, 2016 at 11:42 pm

  9. Oh, this is awful news.

    Like

    michael webster

    June 5, 2016 at 4:21 am

  10. Keith was indeed a prince. I first met him when I was a doctoral student on the job market, through a mutual acquaintance. His school (then UIUC) was not recruiting, so he had no reason to talk to a naive rookie like me, but he graciously listened to me & offered me what turned out to be sage advice, peppered with the gentle good humour & soft drawl that were his hallmarks.

    His death is a deeply sad occasion.

    Brayden: Please pass along my sympathies to Beth, & to all your colleagues in Evanston.

    Like

    Heather Haveman

    June 6, 2016 at 4:43 pm

  11. Thank you so much for sharing this, Brayden. What a great guy. What a great loss. Very, very sad.

    Like

    Amy Cuddy

    June 7, 2016 at 12:54 pm


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: