why did the chicken …
Thanks to the orgtheory team for inviting me to post some food for thought in the coming days–I really enjoy the sense of community this site fosters.
Rather than starting with something heavy, let me celebrate that community by opening with a request: please join me in using the old “Why did the chicken cross the road?” joke to reflect on what organization theory is.
If you have a moment, comment to this post by giving the theory that is supplying the punchline and the answer itself.
Drawing on the two theories I find myself using most often, here are some examples to get us started:
Institutional theory:
(Whining just a bit) “But all the other chickens are doing it, mom.”
-OR-
(Winking) “I don’t really cross it, I just pretend like I’m going to until nobody is looking.”
Organizational ecology:
(Dryly) “Cross the road? I think of it more as exiting the population, really.”
I’m sure these could be done in other ways, and better, so I’d like to hear from others on both these theories and other perspectives such as a network perspective, social movements, TCE, and so forth.
OK, but why?
Mostly for fun, of course, but also to warm up to one of the topics that interests me most, which is how org theorists can embrace their diversity and yet find the coherence needed to be relevant, both in the academy and beyond.
Thanks for playing!
(In case my examples don’t make this perfectly clear, there is absolutely no requirement that these quips by either really funny or even entirely fair.)
Rational choice economics:
…because its discounted preferences indicated the highest available expected utility was on the other side.
Behavioural economics:
…because it irrationally underweighted the probability of being hit by a truck.
Complexity theory:
…because it didn’t spot the black swan on the other side.
LikeLike
Leigh Caldwell
February 9, 2010 at 2:53 am
social networks:
1) Conflict over scarce sidewalk space had decreased social cohesion between the group of chickens on the initial side of the road. This increased the focal chicken’s anxiety about status competition. He thus decided to cross the road to where a friendlier group of chickens appeared to be pecking away.
2) The focal chicken was ostracized from the group after disregarding group norms related to which worms were fair game. He was thus forced to cross the road.
3) Two chickens were on the other side of the road trialing an innovative pecking process. One of them, who had a high tertius iungens orientation, used a riff about the particulars of the pecking process to convince the focal chicken to cross the road and join their efforts. They then proceeded to refine the new pecking process together.
LikeLike
sam_macaulay
February 9, 2010 at 4:22 am
… because economists predicted an arbitrage opportunity on the other side. (performativity)
… because activists framed the chicken’s current side as illegitimate. (social movement theory)
… because the chicken was looking for a problem to solve on the other side. (late era Carnegie school/garbage can)
LikeLike
fabiorojas
February 9, 2010 at 4:27 am
…because the other side was understudied.
LikeLike
tf
February 9, 2010 at 5:09 am
… for no reason at all, that’s why it’s a good instrumental variable! (applied micro)
… to enact the cultural role of being a chicken in a “why does a chicken cross the road” joke. (ethnomethodology)
LikeLike
gabrielrossman
February 9, 2010 at 1:59 pm
…to be with all of the high status chickens on the other side.
…he didn’t. There was no need to cross when he had a redundant contact on the other side.
LikeLike
brayden
February 9, 2010 at 3:15 pm
…because dinner was on the other side (resource dependence).
LikeLike
Noah
February 9, 2010 at 6:38 pm
…because the chicken could: it has legs.
LikeLike
tf
February 9, 2010 at 6:46 pm
Evolutionary theory? “Technology”? I’m guessing …
LikeLike
mtkennedy
February 9, 2010 at 6:53 pm
Just remembered, our evil twin, O&M, had a chicken-road strategy thread a while back: http://organizationsandmarkets.com/2009/02/21/why-did-the-chicken-cross-the-road-strategic-management-edition/
LikeLike
tf
February 9, 2010 at 6:55 pm
Mark: No, though evolutionary and/or technology explanations might potentially work as well.
“Because it could” is more of a Chomskyan/rationalist attempt, melding both ethological intuition for explaining behavior (a la Lorenz) interacted with matters of creativity and the will (a la von Humboldt).
LikeLike
tf
February 9, 2010 at 7:02 pm
TF:
… because the chicken has an innate competency in successfully generating road crossing motions using the deep syntax of walking. (Chomsky/Pinker)
LikeLike
fabiorojas
February 9, 2010 at 8:08 pm
Fabio: I was aiming more toward the 1966 Chomsky (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_linguistics), which doesn’t fit with Pinker.
LikeLike
tf
February 9, 2010 at 8:32 pm
The Strategy people do all the crossing research these days. No one doing OrgTheory cares about chickens and roads anymore or has had a really new, chicken-related idea since 1977.
LikeLike
Kieran
February 9, 2010 at 8:38 pm
TF: I don’t know what your chickens are like, but mine have read Blank Slate from cover to cover.
LikeLike
fabiorojas
February 9, 2010 at 8:47 pm
My chicken has read both Cartesian Linguistics and the Blank Slate, carefully, and seems to be modeling it’s behavior on the former.
LikeLike
tf
February 9, 2010 at 9:10 pm
…to heighten the “differences” between itself and the token duck in the chicken coop (Kanter’s tokenism)
…it was late for its river crossing with the farmer, the fox, and a sack of corn/grain (not an org theory, but a puzzle)
LikeLike
KatherineKChen
February 10, 2010 at 2:41 am
I don’t know, but if that chicken ever crosses the road again, it’ll sleep with the fishes. (New Jersey)
LikeLike
Jeff
February 12, 2010 at 6:02 pm