orgtheory.net

management, orgs and sociology journal impact factors 2010

Love or hate ’em (and, see the discussion about article effects trumping journal effects), here is a selective smattering of 2010 management, orgs and sociology journal impact factors (2010 reported first, then sorted by 5-year impact factor).

By posting these I’m probably just adding legitimacy to a measure that I just don’t think matters a whole lot – but oh well.

Management Journals

  • Academy of Management Review (6.72, 11.66)
  • Academy of Management Journal (5.25, 10.8)
  • Administrative Science Quarterly (3.68, 7.54)
  • Strategic Management Journal (3.58, 6.82)
  • Journal of Management (3.75, 6.21)
  • Organization Science (3.80, 5.84)
  • Academy of Management Annals (5.44, 5.34)
  • Research in Organizational Behavior (4.83, 5.17)
  • Journal of Management Studies (3.82, 4.68)
  • Management Science (2.22, 3.97)
  • Organization Studies (2.34, 3.59)
  • Strategic Organization (2.73, -)

Sociology Journals

  • American Sociological Review (3.69, 5.84)
  • American Journal of Sociology (3.36, 5.11)
  • Annual Review of Sociology (3.59, 5.03)
  • Social Problems (1.62, 2.57)
  • Social Forces (1.23, 2.51)
  • Social Psychology Quarterly (1.11, 2.51)
  • Sociological Methodology (0.88, 2.00)
  • Sociological Theory (1.58, 1.84)

ISI also reports a bundle of other stats: article influence scores, eigenfactor score etc.  Obviously, lots of journals missing from the above – but you can easily look up and compare stats yourself at ISI Web of Knowledge (though, you’ll have to have an institutional subscription).

Written by teppo

July 13, 2011 at 7:03 pm

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. This list looks helpful in terms of prioritizing reading. Can you also do something similar with psychology journals? I know there are a handful (social psych, applied) that do org psych also.

    Like

    furashgf

    July 15, 2011 at 2:33 pm

  2. I also want to see the “Journal of Very Good Experiments that Did Not Reject the Null Hypothesis, but then didn’t go on to mine data until they found a spurious result.”

    Like

    furashgf

    July 15, 2011 at 2:34 pm


Comments are closed.