where’s the capital?
I am a little late to this, but last week a bit of a debate erupted about whether it is better or worse to split-up the political and commercial capitals of countries. It was sparked by an off-hand concluding remark by Luigi Zingales in an article for the City Journal on whether New York is likely to retain its title as the world’s financial capital:
The Founding Fathers wisely decided that the nation’s political capital should be separate from its financial capital (in both senses of the word). Now this splendid segregation has ended.
Greg Mankiw picked up on that quote and spread it around the interwebs.
Then Matt Yglesias weighed in, countering with the boring vs. exciting capital hypothesis:
One model, seen in France and the UK, is of a single dominant city. Another model, seen in Italy, is where your capital is also your largest city (Rome), but the main financial and business center is elsewhere (Milan). Then you have your scenarios, seen in the US and Canada, where a capital is established someplace a bit random specifically to avoid choosing between major cities. This tends to lead to capital cities with a reputation as ‘boring.’
No one was taking this too seriously. But they raise some interesting questions about the relationship between government and economic growth. Zingales and Mankiw’s idea is that separating government from the financial sector is a good thing. They don’t really expand on why, but I can guess at their reasoning: they think that a financial industry that is too close to government is likely to be over-regulated and hamstrung. Yglesias’s idea is simply that stand alone government capitals may be boring (Springfield, Ottawa) or beautiful (Edinburgh, Rome), but whether the capital stands apart shouldn’t matter for much when it comes to actual growth. I’d offer two contrasting alternative hypotheses for why co-locating government and industry might actually matter:
- The Full of Themselves Hypothesis: This one has to do with status hierarchies. Where the government capital is also in the largest city, your status as a government type competes with other status hierarchies (industry, media, education, etc). But in places where the government is the most important game in town, there is really only one status hierarchy. My idea is that legislators are more full of themselves in places where government is the big dog in town. The prediction, then, is that that would be worse for economic performance as legislators go off willy-nilly coming up with big, but ill-conceived, ideas.
- The Social Capture Hypothesis: This one has to do with networks. Where the government capital is also in the largest city, you’d expect bureaucrats and legislators to hobnob fairly regularly with elites from industry and other sectors. This should tend to make their decision-making more elitist (and in the case of finance, more sympathetic to the interests of bankers). Where government stands alone, government should be (a) less beholden to elite interests and/or (b) more influenced by a wider spectrum of special interest group lobbying.
Thanks to the joys of Wikipedia, it’s fairly simple to pull down a few quick and dirty statistics. Nothing definitive, but enough to whet the appetite…
First, some descriptive stats are in order: What is the breakdown of countries and/or states where the largest city is also the capital?
All of the stats I’m going to quote are for 89 countries with more than 6 million residents and, for comparison sake, the 18 US states and 16 Indian states with more than 6 million residents. I should also mention that I am using data on the metropolitan area of cities, not cities-proper (so, e.g., New Delhi is within the metro area of Delhi, not a separate city). The data on cities are from the World Gazetteer for consistency-sake. Everything else comes from Wikipedia. And the numbers are:
Capital is Largest City
Countries (n=89) 70%
US States (n=18) 33%
Indian States (n=16) 44%
So, in general, most national capitals are located in the largest city in the country, but this isn’t true for sub-national states. This raises a few other questions on what determines whether a government capital city is located in the largest city. For instance, one might assume that places where one city really dominates the population of the country, it would be more likely to find the capital in that city. To do this right, you’d want to look at the size of various cities in a country when the capital was established. But it’s too much work to do that right now, so I’m just looking at current correlations. Surprisingly, the correlation between the size of a country or state’s largest city and the rest of its population is negative among countries and Indian states, and practically zero among large US states.
Average Size of the Largest City as a Percent of Total Population | ||
Capital is Largest | Capital is not Largest | |
Countries | 15.71% | 18.82% |
US States | 43.04% | 41.17% |
Indian States | 4.93% | 17.70% |
.
I would have expected it to be the opposite, but one probable explanation for this is the fact that the larger the country or state, the more likely it is that the capital is not in the largest city. There are probably multiple reasons for that, but one of them is simply because the larger the country is, the smaller a percentage any one city can take up (e.g., Shanghai is a city of 21 million people, but that still accounts for just than 1% of China’s population while Athens, at 3 million, takes up 34% of Greece’s population). Another explanation, of course, is that the city that becomes the capital can capture a lot of economic development and therefore becomes the largest over time.
Also somewhat surprising is the question of whether places with two relatively closely matched cities end up putting the capital somewhere in between. My assumption (and Matt’s) was that countries/states where two cities are relatively well matched (think LA and San Francisco, Pittsburgh and Philadelphia) will have remote capitals (Sacramento and Harrisburg). But the data actually show the opposite: the more dominant the largest city is, the more likely it is that the capital is located somewhere else, except in US states where, again, it’s a wash (true for California and Pennsylvania, but not true for Tennessee, which is evenly matched between Nashville and Memphis, and for New York which is decidedly mismatched between New York and Buffalo).
Average Ratio of the Largest City to the Second Largest City |
||
Capital is Largest | Capital is not Largest | |
Countries | 1.83 | 3.32 |
US States | 5.85 | 5.54 |
Indian States | 1.94 | 5.11 |
.
My guess is that this is due to at least two factors: (1) a number of countries have consciously moved their capitals away from the major cities in order to both relieve overcrowding and provide a nicer lifestyle for government bureaucrats and (2) populist or dictatorial regimes sometimes move their capitals away from the major city intentionally as a means of maintaining control by buffering themselves from elites (see hypothesis 2).
Ok. But the big question is whether there is any correlation between the economic success of a place and the status of its capital. I looked at the annual growth of per capita GDP for countries and US states between 1990 and 2007, and for Indian States between 1993 and 2006. The results are mixed.
Average Annual Per Capita Growth of GDP |
||
Capital is Largest | Capital is not Largest | |
Countries | 5.74% | 6.92% |
US States | 2.02% | 1.83% |
Indian States | 4.5% | 4.6% |
.
In general, countries where the capital is not located in the largest city seem to be growing faster than countries where the capital is in the largest city. However, this is where the comparison within countries is important: holding constant the overall growth rate of the country, the results are a wash (or if anything, slightly tilted toward the alternative hypotheses in the case of US States). This tells me that something else is going on… One would want to do a more careful statistical analysis (easily done but beyond what I’m willing to put into it right now) to really test the hypotheses. But I thought the preliminary results are interesting enough to warrant weighing in.
UPDATE: Here are the data, FYI.
Region | Country | US State | Indian State | Political | Largest Metro as Percent of Pop | Largest City Pop | Second City | Second City Pop | Region Population | Largest Metro as Percent of Pop | Ratio of Largest to Second Largest | Large=Pol | Regional Growth |
Australia | 1 | Canberra | Sydney | 4,399,722 | Melbourne | 3,892,419 | 21,848,000 | 20% | 1.130331 | 0 | 5.31% | ||
Bolivia | 1 | Sucre | La Paz | 2,268,683 | Santa Cruz | 1,614,618 | 9,863,000 | 23% | 1.40509 | 0 | 6.01% | ||
Brazil | 1 | Brazillia | Sao Paulo | 20,534,112 | Rio De Jenaro | 12,058,824 | 191,519,000 | 11% | 1.702829 | 0 | 4.58% | ||
Canada | 1 | Ottawa | Toronto | 5,113,149 | Montreal | 3,635,571 | 33,716,000 | 15% | 1.406423 | 0 | 4.35% | ||
China | 1 | Beijing | Shanghai | 17,783,119 | Beijing | 12,230,029 | 1,331,860,000 | 1% | 1.454054 | 0 | 12.37% | ||
Cote d’Ivoire | 1 | Yamoussoukro | Abidjan | 5,878,609 | 21,075,000 | 28% | 0 | 3.30% | |||||
Ecuador | 1 | Quito | Guayaquil | 2,248,800 | Quito | 1,621,817 | 14,014,947 | 16% | 1.386593 | 0 | 8.41% | ||
Germany | 1 | Berlin | Rein-Ruhr | 11,831,297 | Berlin | 4,055,548 | 82,062,200 | 14% | 2.917312 | 0 | 3.72% | ||
India | 1 | Delhi | Mumbai | 21,347,412 | Delhi | 18,639,762 | 1,166,430,000 | 2% | 1.145262 | 0 | 5.71% | ||
Israel | 1 | Jerusalem | Tel Aviv | 3,340,850 | 7,424,400 | 45% | 0 | 6.35% | |||||
Malaysia | 1 | Putrajaya | Kuala Lampur | 7,635,858 | Pinang | 1,856,370 | 27,468,000 | 28% | 4.113328 | 0 | 8.63% | ||
Morocco | 1 | Rabat | Casablanca | 3,269,962 | Rabat | 1,787,307 | 31,491,578 | 10% | 1.829547 | 0 | 5.65% | ||
Myanmar | 1 | Naypyidaw | Rangoon | 4,994,082 | 50,020,000 | 10% | 0 | 7.78% | |||||
Netherlands | 1 | split | Amsterdam | 1,443,258 | Rotterdam | 1,186,818 | 16,517,532 | 9% | 1.216074 | 0 | 5.20% | ||
Nigeria | 1 | Abuja | Lagos | 13,134,029 | Ibadan | 5,210,392 | 154,729,000 | 8% | 2.520737 | 0 | 9.86% | ||
Pakistan | 1 | Islamabad | Karachi | 12,827,927 | Lahore | 6,936,563 | 166,953,500 | 8% | 1.84932 | 0 | 6.37% | ||
Poland | 1 | Warsaw | Katowice | 2,710,397 | Warsaw | 2,660,406 | 38,130,300 | 7% | 1.018791 | 0 | 11.64% | ||
South Africa | 1 | Pretoria | Johannesburg | 7,864,994 | Cape Town | 4,899,329 | 48,697,000 | 16% | 1.605321 | 0 | 5.60% | ||
Sri Lanka | 1 | Sri Jayawardenapura Kotte | Kolamba | 2,618,658 | 20,238,000 | 13% | 0 | 8.40% | |||||
Switzerland | 1 | Berne | Zurich | 1,110,478 | Geneva | 812,000 | 7,725,200 | 14% | 1.367584 | 0 | 2.89% | ||
Syria | 1 | Dimashq | Halab | 2,925,478 | Dimashq | 2,759,230 | 21,906,000 | 13% | 1.060252 | 0 | 7.40% | ||
Tanzania | 1 | Dodoma | Dar es Salaam | 3,092,430 | 43,739,000 | 7% | 0 | 7.02% | |||||
Turkey | 1 | Ankara | Istanbul | 13,778,373 | Ankara | 3,791,642 | 71,517,100 | 19% | 3.63388 | 0 | 5.48% | ||
UAE | 1 | Abu Dhabi | Dubai | 2,353,215 | Abu Dhabi | 945,268 | 4,599,000 | 51% | 2.489469 | 0 | 10.74% | ||
US | 1 | Washington | New York City | 23,141,893 | Los Angeles | 17,881,561 | 306,924,000 | 8% | 1.294176 | 0 | 4.17% | ||
Vietnam | 1 | Hanoi | Ho Chi Minh | 5,318,392 | Hanoi | 2,717,562 | 88,069,000 | 6% | 1.957045 | 0 | 15.15% | ||
Bihar | 1 | Patna | Panta | 2,569,775 | Gaya | 499,874 | 82,998,509 | 3% | 5.140845 | 0 | 4.4% | ||
Chhattisgarh | 1 | Thiruvananthapuram | Kochi | 1,541,175 | Visakhapatnam | 1,047,560 | 31,841,374 | 5% | 1.471205 | 0 | 7.8% | ||
Gujarat | 1 | Gandhinagar | Ahmedabad | 5,334,314 | Surat | 3,196,799 | 50,671,017 | 11% | 1.668642 | 0 | 5.1% | ||
Jharkhand | 1 | Ranchi | Jamshedpur | 1,252,815 | Dhanbad | 1,210,235 | 26,945,829 | 5% | 1.035183 | 0 | 5.3% | ||
Kerala | 1 | Dispur | Guwahati | 1,038,071 | 26,655,528 | 4% | 0 | 4.5% | |||||
Madhya Pradesh | 1 | Bhopal | Indore | 2,049,193 | Bhopal | 1,751,766 | 60,348,023 | 3% | 1.169787 | 0 | 4.1% | ||
Orissa | 1 | Chandigarh | Bhubaneswar | 1,666,429 | Raurkela | 550,668 | 24,358,999 | 7% | 3.026195 | 0 | 2.2% | ||
Punjab | 1 | Raipur | Ludhiana | 1,107,012 | Amritsar | 1,206,918 | 20,833,803 | 5% | 0.917222 | 0 | 4.0% | ||
Uttar Pradesh | 1 | Lucknow | Kanpur | 3,494,275 | Lucknow | 2,991,280 | 190,891,000 | 2% | 1.168154 | 0 | 3.7% | ||
California | 1 | Sacramento | Los Angeles | 15,250,000 | San Francisco | 4,274,531 | 36,756,666 | 41% | 3.567643 | 0 | 1.68% | ||
Florida | 1 | Talahassee | Miami | 5,414,772 | Tampa | 2,733,761 | 18,328,340 | 30% | 1.980704 | 0 | 1.87% | ||
Illinois | 1 | Springfield | Chicago | 9,569,624 | Peoria | 371,206 | 12,901,563 | 74% | 25.77982 | 0 | 1.86% | ||
Michigan | 1 | Lansing | Detroit | 4,425,110 | Grand Rapids | 776,742 | 10,003,422 | 44% | 5.697014 | 0 | 1.60% | ||
Missouri | 1 | Jefferson City | St. Louis | 2,816,710 | Kansas City | 2,002,047 | 5,911,605 | 48% | 1.406915 | 0 | 1.57% | ||
New York | 1 | Albany | New York City | 19,006,798 | Buffalo | 1,124,309 | 19,490,297 | 98% | 16.90532 | 0 | 2.04% | ||
North Carolina | 1 | Raleigh | Charlotte | 1,701,799 | Raleigh | 1,088,765 | 9,222,414 | 18% | 1.563054 | 0 | 1.99% | ||
Ohio | 1 | Columbus | Cleveland | 2,088,291 | Cincinatti | 2,009,632 | 11,485,910 | 18% | 1.039141 | 0 | 1.72% | ||
Pennsylvania | 1 | Harrisburg | Philadelphia | 5,838,471 | Pittsburgh | 2,351,192 | 12,448,279 | 47% | 2.483196 | 0 | 1.91% | ||
Texas | 1 | Austin | Dallas | 6,300,006 | Houston | 5,728,143 | 24,326,974 | 26% | 1.099834 | 0 | 2.02% | ||
Virginia | 1 | Richmond | Virginia Beach | 1,658,292 | Richmond | 1,225,626 | 7,769,089 | 21% | 1.353016 | 0 | 1.90% | ||
Washington | 1 | Olympia | Seattle | 3,344,813 | Spokane | 456,175 | 6,549,224 | 51% | 7.332302 | 0 | 1.80% | ||
Afghanistan | 1 | Kabul | Kabul | 2,413,032 | 28,150,000 | 9% | 1 | 5.74% | |||||
Algeria | 1 | Algiers | Algiers | 6,488,795 | 34,895,000 | 19% | 1 | 4.58% | |||||
Angola | 1 | Luanda | Luanda | 4,577,500 | 18,498,000 | 25% | 1 | 10.03% | |||||
Argentina | 1 | Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires | 14,393,015 | Córdoba | 1,819,522 | 40,135,000 | 36% | 7.910328 | 1 | 3.70% | ||
Austria | 1 | Viena | Viena | 2,179,769 | Linz | 532,995 | 8,356,707 | 26% | 4.089661 | 1 | 4.44% | ||
Austria | 1 | Vienna | Vienna | 2,123,829 | 8,356,707 | 25% | 1 | 4.92% | |||||
Azerbaijan | 1 | Baku | Baku | 2,255,268 | 8,629,900 | 26% | 1 | 9.66% | |||||
Bangladesh | 1 | Dhaka | Dhaka | 13,778,179 | Chāţţagām | 3,761,337 | 162,221,000 | 8% | 3.663107 | 1 | 4.83% | ||
Belarus | 1 | Minsk | Minsk | 1,758,453 | 9,671,900 | 18% | 1 | 5.23% | |||||
Belgium | 1 | Brussels | Brussels | 1,800,663 | Antwerp | 915,258 | 10,741,000 | 17% | 1.967383 | 1 | 4.55% | ||
Cameroon | 1 | Yaoundé | Yaoundé | 2,184,528 | 19,522,000 | 11% | 1 | 3.20% | |||||
Chad | 1 | N’Djaména | N’Djaména | 1,554,578 | 11,206,000 | 14% | 1 | 9.72% | |||||
Chile | 1 | Santiago | Santiago | 5,145,599 | 16,938,000 | 30% | 1 | 9.79% | |||||
Colombia | 1 | Bogota | Bogota | 8,286,535 | Medellin | 3,337,722 | 45,006,200 | 18% | 2.482692 | 1 | 7.70% | ||
Congo | 1 | Kinshasa | Kinshasa | 10,076,099 | Lubumbashi | 1,713,852 | 66,020,000 | 15% | 5.879212 | 1 | 0.16% | ||
Cuba | 1 | Habana | Habana | 2,601,335 | 11,204,000 | 23% | 1 | 3.14% | |||||
Egypt | 1 | Cairo | Cairo | 16,254,102 | al-Iskandarīyah | 4,545,218 | 76,855,037 | 21% | 3.576089 | 1 | 7.45% | ||
Ethiopia | 1 | Addis Ababa | Addis Ababa | 3,230,771 | 79,221,000 | 4% | 1 | 2.55% | |||||
France | 1 | Paris | Paris | 11,089,124 | Lyon | 1,717,300 | 65,073,482 | 17% | 6.457302 | 1 | 3.77% | ||
Ghana | 1 | Accra | Accra | 4,092,613 | Kumasi | 1,852,449 | 23,837,000 | 17% | 2.209299 | 1 | 5.38% | ||
Greece | 1 | Athens | Athens | 3,853,451 | 11,262,500 | 34% | 1 | 7.33% | |||||
Guatemala | 1 | Guatemala | Guatemala | 3,481,976 | 14,027,000 | 25% | 1 | 9.80% | |||||
Guinea | 1 | Conakry | Conakry | 1,931,184 | 10,069,000 | 19% | 1 | 2.42% | |||||
Haiti | 1 | Port-au-Prince | Port-au-Prince | 1,753,767 | 10,033,000 | 17% | 1 | 4.87% | |||||
Honduras | 1 | Tegucigalpa | Tegucigalpa | 2,187,434 | 7,466,000 | 29% | 1 | 7.44% | |||||
Hungary | 1 | Budapest | Budapest | 2,573,664 | 10,029,900 | 26% | 1 | 8.10% | |||||
Indonesia | 1 | Jakarta | Jakarta | 18,924,470 | Bandung | 6,492,753 | 230,512,000 | 8% | 2.914707 | 1 | 6.08% | ||
Iran | 1 | Tehran | Tehran | 12,949,621 | Esfahan | 3,075,665 | 70,495,782 | 18% | 4.210348 | 1 | 7.10% | ||
Iraq | 1 | Bagdad | Bagdad | 11,206,300 | Basra | 4,094,523 | 30,747,000 | 36% | 2.7369 | 1 | 8.59% | ||
Italy | 1 | Rome | Rome | 3,457,690 | Milan | 3,076,643 | 60,090,400 | 6% | 1.123852 | 1 | 3.45% | ||
Japan | 1 | Tokyo | Tokyo | 37,468,203 | Osaka | 17,411,857 | 127,580,000 | 29% | 2.151879 | 1 | 2.00% | ||
Kenya | 1 | Nairobi | Nairobi | 4,112,322 | 39,802,000 | 10% | 1 | 5.96% | |||||
Madagascar | 1 | Antananarivo | Antananarivo | 1,740,322 | 19,625,000 | 9% | 1 | 5.31% | |||||
Mali | 1 | Bamako | Bamako | 2,209,225 | 13,010,000 | 17% | 1 | 6.07% | |||||
Mexico | 1 | Mexico City | Mexico City | 23,293,783 | Guadalajara | 4,205,153 | 107,550,697 | 22% | 5.539343 | 1 | 5.97% | ||
Mozambique | 1 | Maputo | Maputo | 2,058,054 | 22,894,000 | 9% | 1 | 5.69% | |||||
Nepal | 1 | Katmandu | Katmandu | 1,687,102 | 29,331,000 | 6% | 1 | 6.43% | |||||
North Korea | 1 | Pyŏngyang | Pyŏngyang | 3,198,937 | 24,051,706 | 13% | 1 | 0.02% | |||||
Peru | 1 | Lima | Lima | 7,902,851 | 29,165,000 | 27% | 1 | 8.00% | |||||
Phillipines | 1 | Manila | Manila | 19,888,419 | 92,226,600 | 22% | 1 | 7.18% | |||||
Portugal | 1 | Lisboa | Lisboa | 2,638,211 | 10,631,800 | 25% | 1 | 6.60% | |||||
Romania | 1 | Bucuresti | Bucuresti | 2,177,669 | 21,496,700 | 10% | 1 | 8.79% | |||||
Russia | 1 | Moscow | Moscow | 14,837,510 | St. Petersburg | 4,798,526 | 141,868,000 | 10% | 3.092097 | 1 | 5.18% | ||
Saudi Arabia | 1 | Riyadh | Riyadh | 5,150,000 | Jeddah | 3,600,000 | 25,721,000 | 20% | 1.430556 | 1 | 4.54% | ||
Senegal | 1 | Dakar | Dakar | 2,535,431 | 12,534,000 | 20% | 1 | 3.56% | |||||
Serbia | 1 | Beograd | Beograd | 1,774,990 | 9,850,000 | 18% | 1 | 0.99% | |||||
Somalia | 1 | Muqdisho | Muqdisho | 1,663,223 | 9,133,000 | 18% | 1 | 5.65% | |||||
South Korea | 1 | Seoul | Seoul | 20,550,000 | Busan | 3,650,000 | 48,333,000 | 43% | 5.630137 | 1 | 7.13% | ||
Spain | 1 | Madrid | Madrid | 5,804,829 | Barcelona | 4,233,638 | 45,828,172 | 13% | 1.371121 | 1 | 5.34% | ||
Sudan | 1 | Khartum | Khartum | 9,514,261 | 42,272,000 | 23% | 1 | 7.63% | |||||
Sweden | 1 | Stockholm | Stockholm | 1,860,872 | Göteborg | 873,335 | 9,283,722 | 20% | 2.130765 | 1 | 3.33% | ||
Taiwan | 1 | Taipei | Taipei | 8,422,488 | Kaohsiung | 2,718,589 | 23,027,672 | 37% | 3.09811 | 1 | |||
Thailand | 1 | Bangkok | Bangkok | 9,972,337 | 63,389,730 | 16% | 1 | 6.41% | |||||
Uganda | 1 | Kampala | Kampala | 1,876,485 | 32,710,000 | 6% | 1 | 7.47% | |||||
UK | 1 | London | London | 13,219,506 | Manchester-Liverpool | 5,163,631 | 82,062,200 | 16% | 2.560118 | 1 | 5.82% | ||
Ukraine | 1 | Kiev | Kiev | 2,987,132 | Donets’k | 1,623,194 | 46,143,700 | 6% | 1.84028 | 1 | 2.67% | ||
Uzbekistan | 1 | Toshkent | Toshkent | 3,235,029 | 27,488,000 | 12% | 1 | 1.60% | |||||
Venezuela | 1 | Caracas | Caracas | 4,368,552 | Maracaibo | 2,484,277 | 28,359,313 | 15% | 1.75848 | 1 | 9.97% | ||
Yemen | 1 | Şan’ā | Şan’ā | 1,976,081 | 23,580,000 | 8% | 1 | 11.39% | |||||
Zambia | 1 | Lusaka | Lusaka | 2,851,411 | 12,935,000 | 22% | 1 | 6.89% | |||||
Zimbabwe | 1 | Harare | Harare | 3,124,683 | 12,523,000 | 25% | 1 | -8.00% | |||||
Andhra Pradesh | 1 | Hyderbad | Hyderbad | 6,290,397 | Visakhapatnam | 1,511,687 | 76,210,007 | 8% | 4.161177 | 1 | 5.1% | ||
Assam | 1 | Bhubaneswar | Bhubaneswar | 1,666,429 | Raurkela | 550,668 | 36,804,660 | 5% | 3.026195 | 1 | 2.4% | ||
Karnataka | 1 | Bangalore | Bangalore | 6,466,271 | Maisuru | 1,230,039 | 52,850,562 | 12% | 5.256964 | 1 | 5.6% | ||
Maharashtra | 1 | Mumbai | Mumbai | 21,347,412 | Pune | 5,273,211 | 96,878,627 | 22% | 4.048276 | 1 | 4.6% | ||
Rajasthan | 1 | Jaipur | Jaipur | 3,102,808 | Jodhpur | 971,407 | 56,507,188 | 5% | 3.194138 | 1 | 3.8% | ||
Tamil Nadu | 1 | Chennai | Chennai | 7,305,169 | Coimbatore | 1,644,224 | 62,405,679 | 12% | 4.442928 | 1 | 5.1% | ||
West Bengal | 1 | Kolkata | Kolkata | 15,414,859 | Asansol | 1,317,369 | 80,176,197 | 19% | 11.70125 | 1 | 4.8% | ||
Arizona | 1 | Phoenix | Phoenix | 4,281,899 | Tucson | 1,012,018 | 6,500,180 | 66% | 4.23105 | 1 | 2.46% | ||
Georgia | 1 | Atlanta | Atlanta | 5,376,285 | Savanna | 329,329 | 9,685,744 | 56% | 16.32497 | 1 | 1.63% | ||
Indiana | 1 | Indianapolis | Indianapolis | 1,715,459 | Ft. Wayne | 390,156 | 6,376,792 | 27% | 4.396854 | 1 | 2.06% | ||
Massachusetts | 1 | Boston | Boston | 4,522,858 | Worcester | 781,352 | 6,497,967 | 70% | 5.788502 | 1 | 2.24% | ||
New Jersey | 1 | Trenton | Trenton | 365,449 | Atlantic City | 270,644 | 8,682,661 | 4% | 1.350294 | 1 | 1.58% | ||
Tennessee | 1 | Nashville | Nashville | 1,550,733 | Memphis | 1,285,732 | 6,214,888 | 25% | 1.206109 | 1 | 2.17% |
Karl Smith comments on the issue here.
LikeLike
TGGP
July 21, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Given the prior work of both, I find it much more likely that both Mankiw and Zingales’ reasons for preferring separation are due to the capture hypothesis – not the idea that regulators with more contact with financiers are likely to be more stringent in their regulation.
LikeLike
Charlie
July 21, 2009 at 7:52 pm
The list shows 23 countries with separate political and commercial capitals (in Bolivia the President and Legislature sit in La Paz, which is also the largest city so Sucre is not really the capital, and in Sri Lanka the administrative capital is a suburb of Colombo). Of those, by my count five (Cote d’Ivoire, Malaysia, Burma, Nigeria, and Tanzania) are places where the capital has been moved in the last 10 years or so, so I don’t think you can attribute much historic economic growth to the choice of capital city.
As for the rest, it’s hard to see why it matters. In the US and in India, the capital was originally in the biggest and most important city: Philadelphia and Delhi. But in one, the capital was moved for political purposes while in the other it wasn’t. But in both cases a new city is now the financial and business capital. Would America’s economy have grown more slowly if the capital had stayed in Philadelphia when presumably that would have done nothing to dent New York’s advantages as a trading center? Would India have grown faster if the capital and its corresponding massive bureaucracy had been moved Brasilia-style to the middle of nowhere? In both cases it’s hard to see why.
LikeLike
T-Rock
July 22, 2009 at 9:29 pm
Admittedly, there are lots of complications. I’m certainly not claiming a whole lot, particularly from the data I threw up (and thanks for the clarification on Sri Lanka and La Paz).
I was actually hoping to use the changes as some kind of an identification strategy: i.e., growth before and after. I still may at some point if I feel like this little idea has legs. Which it probably does not: there are simply too many complications.
And you are also probably right that ‘growth’ may not be the best approach here. Maybe better would be some kind of specific legislation.
LikeLike
Sean Safford
July 22, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Zingales and Mankiw also both need to learn a little more American history – the Founding Fathers put the capital in Philadelphia, which was the biggest city and financial capital of the US at the time. Washington only became the capital when the Constitution was written.
Germany might be a natural experiment: Berlin was the political and financial capital of Germany until 1945; after the war Frankfurt became the financial capital and Bonn the political capital. But I don’t know how you compare governance in the Weimar Republic to governance in the Federal Republic.
LikeLike
T-Rock
July 23, 2009 at 10:49 pm
I do think the natural experiment route is the way to go on this… Though, its actually hard to find examples of countries/states that shift a capital from a backwater to the major city.
But more generally, I keep thinking that this might be a useful instrumental variable for something. Time will tell.
LikeLike
Sean Safford
July 24, 2009 at 2:27 pm
[…] Journal that it was wise to have financial and political capitals in different cities, but that is not at all obvious. He may also undersell his case for Jackson’s refusal to renew the Second Bank of the United […]
LikeLike
A higher standard for Zingales « Entitled to an Opinion
September 9, 2009 at 5:06 am